Human integrity in the context of approaching technological singularity

Purpose. Under the conditions of the development of the artificial intelligence, the problem of the structure disintegration in the society of modernity has become more sensitive and acute. The potential onset of the technological singularity can raise the question of both new differentiation of humanity and its possible disintegration, Therefore, it is relevant to formulate new grounds for the integrity of an individual , in general, and an individual as a representative of the society, in particular. Theoretical basis. The theoretical base of the study is the exposure of contradictions ,which have been forming during the crises of the human integrity. In this reseach, the use of the principles of systematization, the methods of analogy and of conceivable experiments, the,comparison of mimetic and analytical approaches, the principles of the unity of the historical and the logical are represented. The general artificial intelligence is perceived as a potential technogenic subject that occupies the position of the Other in relation to human beings. Scientific novelty. The author has investigated the foundations of human integrity, which are based on understanding human history as a separate stage in the development of intelligible subjects. It is shown that the period of history from the beginning of the use of tools by humans up to the technological singularity can be presented as the pivotal time for future generations of people who could retain their anthropomorphism. It is also shown that the human individual has a set of properties that can preserve his/her relevance as a model of intellectual development for technosubjects, that is post-anthropic human beings.
Conclusions. The foundations of the post-singular human integrity can be divided into two components. A) Those functions which a person has being used, and which will ensure their integrity, just as an ecological niche ensures the integrity of the biological species that exists within it. The general AI as an individual subject will not be able to fully know itself, to have full limits of anthropomorphism, which make it necessary not only to analyse but also to partially copy human behaviour. B) The human beings will likely retain their significance as a benchmark for psychophysical problems and as a benchmark for the development of intelligence, in which the individuality achieves relative harmony with subjectivity cycles of human personality reproduction, which will be based on the culture of human beings during the axial age. The refusal to compare oneself with the problems and values of the axial age can either lead to the cultural degradation of the anthropomorphic human being, who will effectively become a savage, even more vulnerable to the influence of technosubjects, or to the transformation of human subjectivity, the transformation into a human-machine symbiont, in which the human component consciously shuns completely independent decision-making process.